Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

15 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 583 (2004-2005)
Attorney Fee-Shifting in America: Comparing, Contrasting, and Combining the American Rule and English Rule

handle is hein.journals/iicl15 and id is 591 raw text is: ATTORNEY FEE-SHIFTING IN AMERICA:
David A. Root*
The headline in the New York Times read, You Win but You Lose, as
the author lamented about the money he had to pay out in successfully
defending himself in a libel suit.' While the amount was only $5,134.80 (small
fees in comparison to many lawsuits), the fact that frivolous lawsuits could be
pursued by hasty plaintiffs without the threat of having to pay a successful
defendant's legal costs inflamed the author as he was bitten by the American
rule.2 Like him, other commentators and judicial experts have clamored for
the adoption of the English loser pays rule in many areas.of the law, hoping
to decrease frivolous and unreasonable litigation.3
However, it is not all a bed of roses on the other side of the Atlantic. In
London, England, Pauline Hughes brought an action against the treating
physicians following her late husband's death caused by his gall bladder
surgery.4 After an initial victory in the trial court and an award of $396,000,
the appellate court overturned Mrs. Hughes' victory and, in accordance with the
loser pays rule, ordered her to pay the successful doctors' litigation
expenses.5 These expenses totaled $144,000, on top of her own legal fees of
$146,000, thus totaling $290,000 in an attempt to sort out and make right the
tragic events befallen her deceased husband.6
Suffice it to say, there are short-comings and limitations to both the
American and English systems of allocating attorneys fees. However, there are
* J.D./M.B.A. candidate, 2006, Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis,
Kelley Graduate School of Business - Indianapolis. The author wishes to thank his parents,
Clyde R. and Maryanne Root, as well as his brothers, Mark and Jon Root, for all of their love,
support and encouragement.
1. Steven Brill, You Win but You Lose, N.Y. TIMES, July 2, 1980, at A27.
2. Id.
3. Robert Brookins, Mixed-Motives, Title VI, and Removing Sexism from Employment:
The Reality and the Rhetoric, 59 ALB. L. REv. 1,51 n.250 (1995) (Congress can substantially
reduce the threat from frivolous litigation by requiring losers to pay the opponent's attorney
4. John F. Vargo, The American Rule on Attorney Fee Allocation: The Injured Person's
Access to Justice, 42 AM. U. L. REv. 1567, 1568-69 (1993).
5. Id. at 1569. The physicians based their appeal solely on the merits of Mrs. Hughes'
medical negligence claim, and in no way argued that Mrs. Hughes' counsel had acted in an
abusive manner. Id.
6. Id.
7. Gregory E. Maggs & Michael D. Weiss, Progress on Attorney's Fees: Expanding the

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom