About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

11 Hous. J. Int'l L. 337 (1988-1989)
Universality and the Responsibility to Enforce International Criminal Law: No U.S. Sanctuary for Alleged Nazi War Criminals

handle is hein.journals/hujil11 and id is 345 raw text is: UNIVERSALITY AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO
ENFORCE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL
LAW: NO U.S. SANCTUARY FOR
ALLEGED NAZI WAR
CRIMINALS
Jordan J. Paust*
Today it is generally recognized that customary international law of
a peremptory nature places an obligation on each nation-state to search
for and bring into custody and to initiate prosecution of or to extradite
all persons within its territory or control who are reasonably accused of
having committed, for example, war crimes, genocide, breaches of neu-
trality, and other crimes against peace.1
With respect to war crimes in particular, there has been a long his-
tory of expectation that war crimes are offenses against humankind over
which there is universal jurisdiction and a universal duty to prosecute.2
For over two hundred years, the United States has generally shared such
expectations and has imposed criminal sanctions against our own nation-
als and those of other countries, here and abroad, in military commis-
sions and other fora, for violations of the laws of armed conflict.3
Additionally, there are numerous recognitions outside the United States
of such a jurisdictional competence and responsibility. As an example,
the 1919 Report presented to the Preliminary Peace Conference by the
* Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center. The following essay is based on
a speech delivered at the Boston College Law School conference on Holocaust and Human
Rights Law: The Third International Conference on April 11, 1988, and is printed with the
permission of the Boston College Law School Holocaust Human Rights Research Project.
1. See, e.g., M.C. BASSIOUNI, A DRAFr INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE AND DRAFr
STATUTE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL 110 (1987) (such duty is a general
principle of international law.); M.C. BASSIOUNI, INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAw-A
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE 110 (1980); Paust, Extradition and United States
Prosecution of the Achille Lauro Hostage-Takers: Navigating the Hazards, 20 VAND. J. TRANS.
L. 235, 237-38 (1987), and references cited; Paust & Blaustein, War Crimes Jurisdiction and
Due Process: The Bangladesh Experience, 11 VAND. J. TRANS. L. 1, 20-29 (1978), and refer-
ences cited.
2. See, e.g., Paust, Federal Jurisdiction Over Extraterritorial Acts of Terrorism and
Nonimmunity for Foreign Violators of International Law Under the FSIA and the Act of State
Doctrine, 23 VA. J. INT'L L. 191, 211-12, 223-24 (1983); supra note 1; see infra text accompa-
nying notes 5-6, 10-11, and 14.
3. See, e.g., Paust, My Lai and Vietnam: Norms, Myths and Leader Responsibility, 57
MIL. L. REv. 99, 112-18, 164-84 (1972), and references cited.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most