Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

27 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 227 (1995-1996)
Forensic Hair Comparison Analysis: Nineteenth Century Science or Twentieth Century Snake Oil

handle is hein.journals/colhr27 and id is 235 raw text is: FORENSIC HAIR COMPARISON ANALYSIS:
by Clive A. Stafford Smith*
and Patrick D. Goodman*
The purpose of this Article is to reopen the debate on the use
of forensic hair comparison analysis in criminal prosecutions. The
limited empirical studies that have been completed in this area' reveal
more questions than answers. Until these questions have been
answered, forensic hair comparison analysis should not be used to
condemn those who would otherwise be presumed innocent of
committing crimes.
This Article does not argue for the abolishment of forensic hair
comparison analysis. Nor does it ignore the potential for development
of improved hair analysis in the future.2 Rather, it attempts to raise
*   Director, Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. B.A.,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (1981); J.D., Columbia University School of
Law (1984).
**   B.A., University of California, Los Angeles (1991); M.Ed., University of
California, Los Angeles (1992); J.D., Columbia University School of Law (expected 1996);
Head Notes Editor, Columbia Human Rights Law Review (1995-96).
The authors wish to thank Professor Michael 0. Finkelstein, Columbia
University School of Law, Dr. Bernard Robaire, McGill University, and David Lund, for
their generous comments and critique. The authors also wish to thank editors Sherab
Posel, John Barlow Weiner, Ian Ford, and Randy Kim, as well as Professor Michael J.
Goodman, for their invaluable help.
1.   See B.D. Gaudette & E.S. Keeping, An Attempt at Determining Probabilities in
Human Scalp Hair Comparison, 19 J. Forensic Sci. 599 (1974) [hereinafter Scalp Hair
Comparison]; B.D. Gaudette, Probabilities and Human Pubic Hair Comparisons, 21 J.
Forensic Sci. 514 (1976) [hereinafter Pubic Hair Comparison]; B.D. Gaudette, Some
Further Thoughts on Probabilities in Human Hair Comparisons, 23 J. Forensic Sci. 758
(1978) [hereinafter Some Further Thoughts]; Ray A. Wickenheiser & David G. Hepworth,
Further Evaluation of Probabilities in Human Scalp Hair Comparisons, 35 J. Forensic
Sci. 1323 (1990).
2.   The potential exists for more effective hair analysis using better tools. See, e.g.,
Muhammad Y. Choudhry et al., Individual Characteristics of Chemically Modified
Human Hairs Revealed by Scanning Electron Microscopy, 28 J. Forensic Sci. 293 (1983);
Jean-Louis Clement et al., New Concepts about Hair Identification Revealed by Electron
Microscope Studies, 26 J. Forensic Sci. 447 (1981).

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom