Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 247 (1994-1995)
Same-Sex Marriage: The Fundamental Right of Marriage and an Examination of Conflict of Laws and the Full Faith and Credit Clause

handle is hein.journals/colhr26 and id is 255 raw text is: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE:
by Robert L. Cordell II*
There is no more lovely, friendly and charming relationship,
communion or company than a good marriage.*
Marriage is one of the basic, fundamental rights afforded
people of the United States and the world. However, it is not a right
extended to all people. Many couples who desire to take on the rights
and obligations of marriage are prohibited from doing so merely
because the partners are of the same sex.
The institution of marriage binds a couple together both
symbolically and legally. Although many same-sex couples have united
themselves through the symbol of marriage, their marriages are not
recognized as legally valid in any state. In 1993, a lawsuit brought by
three couples from Hawaii against the state's Department of Health
reached the Hawaiian Supreme Court.' The suit, Baehr v. Lewin, was
the couples' response to the denial of their marriage license
applications. The sole reason the licenses were denied was because
each applicant couple is of the same sex.2
The plaintiffs filed a complaint for injunctive and declaratory
relief in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii, on May
1, 1991.3 They sought, inter alia, two main forms of relief: 1) a
declaration that Hawaii Revised Statutes § 572-1 (1985), the section of
*   B.A., B.S., Southern Methodist University (1992); J.D. Columbia University
School of Law (expected 1995). Articles Editor, Columbia Human Rights Law Review
(1994-95). The author wishes to thank Suzanne Kaiser and Michone Johnson for their
help in editing this Note. Special thanks to Evan Wolfson, of Lambda Legal Defense and
Education Fund, and Greg McCurdy, of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy for use of
a chart of marriage laws compiled by them and their staffs.
**  Dr. Martin Luther's Divine Discourses at His Table, Table Talk § 292 (London,
William Du-Gard 1652).
1.  Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44 (Haw. 1993).
2.  Plaintiffs in the case are Ninia Baehr, Genora Dancel, Tammy Rodrigues,
Antoinette Pregil, Pat Lagon, and Joseph Melilio. Id.
3. Id. at 48.

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom