About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

3 Chi. J. Int'l L. 481 (2002)
Toward Fair Play: A Decade of Transformation and Resistance in International Human Rights Advocacy in Brazil

handle is hein.journals/cjil3 and id is 487 raw text is: Toward Fair Play: A Decade of Transformation and Resistance in International Human Rights Advocacy in Brazil James L. Cavalaro In conferences and panels on human rights practice in Brazil, I often resort to a simplified analogy between soccer matches and international human rights litigation and advocacy, one certain to be understood in the world's premier soccer nation. The analogy concerns the expectations that a player or team brings onto the field at the beginning of any match, and those of a litigant (or attorney) seeking to bring her case before an international human rights oversight body. To begin, I tell the audience that the players expect fair play: that the other team has recognized the competition itself and its rules; that the other team has joined a league or confederation and has ceded to that body some control over the match; that the other side will respect the rules that have been established for match play and will abide by the determinations of the judges and referee during the course of the match. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, players expect that the other team will respect the final outcome of the match and will assume the consequences inherent in that decision. When the match decides a championship, one team expects that the other will surrender the championship trophy. Were soccer more like international human rights litigation, it would be an odd spectacle: teams would often play uncontested matches, flagrant fouls would be committed without penalties, players would routinely disregard the referees' rulings, and the losers would often return home self-declared victors. How does one play in these circumstances? As in most of the developing world (and in many developed states), the greatest challenge facing human rights lawyers in Brazil is the inherent weakness of the AB, Harvard College, 1984 JD, University of California, Berkeley (Boalt Hall), 1992; PhD Candidate, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Spain; Orville Schell Fellow, Human Rights Watch, 1992-93; Clerk, Honorable Dolores K. Sloviter, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1993-94; Brazil Office Director, Human Rights Watch, 1994-99; Founder and Executive Director, GlobalJustice Center, 1999-2002; Associate Director, Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School, 2002-present.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most