About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Current Issues Crim. Just. 203 (2011-2012)
Victoria's New Homicide Laws: Provocative Reforms or More Stories of Women's 'Asking for It'?

handle is hein.journals/cicj23 and id is 207 raw text is: Victoria's New Homicide Laws:
Provocative Reforms or More Stories
of Women 'asking for it'?
Danielle Tyson*
Abstract
The controversial partial defence of provocation has now been abolished in three
Australian jurisdictions, including Victoria. Recent developments in Victorian case law
would appear to suggest a continuation of 'excuses' for male anger and violence towards
women that position the woman victim as to blame for her own death. This article
considers that the 2005 abolition of provocation was only in part designed to redress the
problem of victim-blame. The decision was accompanied by other key changes introduced
into the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) to make it easier for women who kill in the context of
family violence to successfully claim self-defence and 'excessive self-defence' (defensive
homicide). Drawing on recent developments in Victorian case law since the 2005
amendments, this article argues that the claim that provocation's victim-blaming
narratives are being mobilised in the guise of other defences merits closer analysis. It also
argues that provocation's critics must continue to expose the gendered (and raced)
assumptions underlying the other defences to homicide, such as self-defence including
manslaughter and the new offence of defensive homicide. Otherwise there is a risk that
provocation's victim-blaming narratives could end up rewritten in such a way that support
an argument for a reduction in culpability in cases where there is a history of violence
against the woman victim, which is likely to result in claims that little has changed.
Introduction
In 2008, Western Australia became the third Australian state to pass legislation repealing the
controversial rule of law that provocation reduces murder to manslaughter (Criminal Law
Amendment (Homicide) Act 2008 (WA)). Tasmania abolished the provocation defence in
2003 (Criminal Code Amendment (Abolition of Defence of Provocation) Act 2003 (Tas)), as
did Victoria in 2005 (Crimes (Homicide) Act 2005 (Vic)). The partial defence of
provocation still operates in one of the common law and four of the code jurisdictions in
Australia. In South Australia, the qualified defence of provocation is governed by the
Danielle Tyson (PhD) is a lecturer in Criminology at Monash University (Danielle.Tyson@monash.edu).
Earlier versions of this article were presented in 2010 as a Visiting Scholar at the Social and Legal Responses
to Violence in Canada Research Unit, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Guelph,
Ontario, Canada, and at the 23rd Annual Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology (ANZSOC)
Conference on Cross-border Domestic and Transnational Crime: Risks and Responses, Alice Springs,
Australia, 28-30 September 2010. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation and thanks to the audiences
who were present at these two presentations for taking an interest in my work and for their questions and
feedback. I am also extremely grateful for the invaluable suggestions for revision and improvement from the
two anonymous reviewers.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most