Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

44 Am. U. L. Rev. 127 (1994-1995)
Absurdity and the Limits of Literalism: Defining the Absurd Result Principle in Statutory Interpretation

handle is hein.journals/aulr44 and id is 146 raw text is: ABSURDITY AND THE LIMITS OF
[I] t is a venerable principle that a law will not be interpreted to
produce absurd results. The common sense of man approves the
judgment mentioned by Puffendorf, that the Bolognian law which
enacted 'that whoever drew blood in the streets should be punished
with the utmost severity,' did not extend to the surgeon who
opened the vein of a person that fell down in the street in a fit.
The same common sense accepts the ruling, cited by Plowden, that
the statute of 1st Edward II, which enacts that a prisoner who
breaks prison shall be guilty of felony, does not extend to a
prisoner who breaks out when the prison is on fire-'for he is not
to be hanged because he would not stay to be burnt.'
[T]he absurdity clause has a relative and variable content which
threatens the entire foundation of literal theory.'
The absurd result principle in statutory interpretation provides an
exception to the rule that a statute should be interpreted according
* © 1994 Veronica M. Dougherty.
** Assistant Director, Law and Public Policy Program, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law,
Cleveland State University. J.D. 1987, Harvard Law School; M.P.P. 1987, Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University; B.A. 1977, Bethany College.
I wish to thank Paula Dubberly, David F. Forte, and Timothy M. Hurley for helpful comments
on prior drafts, and Edward K. Bilich for the conversation that originally piqued my interest in
this topic.
1. KMart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281,325 (1988) (Scalia,J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part) (quoting United States v. Kirby, 74 U.S. 482, 487 (1868)).
2. E. Russell Hopkins, The Literal Canon and the Golden Rule, 15 CAN. B. REv. 689, 695

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom