65 Antitrust L.J. 865 (1996-1997)
Effect of Twenty Years of Hart-Scott-Rodino on Merger Practice: A Case Study in the Law of Unintended Consequences Applied to Antitrust Legislation, The; Sims, Joe; Herman, Deborah P.

handle is hein.journals/antil65 and id is 873 raw text is: THE EFFECT OF TWENTY YEARS OF
HART-SCOTT-RODINO ON MERGER PRACTICE:
A CASE STUDY IN THE LAW OF UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCES APPLIED TO
ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
JOE SIMS
DEBORAH P. HERMAN*
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 19761 (HSR
Act) is now twenty years old. This means that a generation of antitrust
lawyers and business people have no memory of merger law asjurispru-
dence-a body of case law created by the interaction of advocates before
neutral arbiters-as opposed to regulation. It also means that it is timely
to see what Messrs. Hart, Scott, and Rodino (and the rest of their legisla-
tive colleagues) actually produced. We think they would be quite sur-
prised that this modest legislation has had such a dramatic impact.
In fact, the premerger notification provisions of the HSR Acte have
been, in our opinion, the most important factor in the replacement of
merger control through litigation with a comprehensive scheme of
merger regulation. This significant development was clearly not the
intended consequence of the statute; those of us who were present at
the creation3 know that the congressional objective in 1976 was much
* Members of the District of Columbia and Arizona, and Ohio and Illinois bars, respec-
tively. The authors gratefully acknowledge the research assistance of Melinda Klug Gillis,
Janel A. Mulvihill, and David 0. Zimmer.
Pub. L. No. 94-435, 90 Stat. 1383 (1976) (codified in various sections of 15, 18, and
28 U.S.C.).
2 Because this is now common usage, we will use the term HSR to mean only the
premerger notification provisions of the HSR Act. The rest of the HSR Act (increased
investigatory powers for the DOJ and parens patriae litigation authority for state attorneys
general) is not really relevant to this article.
3 From 1974-1978, Joe Sims was Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust
Division and was deeply involved with the negotiations and deliberations on HSR, both
on the Hill and within the Ford Administration. During that time he advocated the
Administration's position on the issues that ultimately became HSR, including its support
for a premerger notification scheme that would ensure that prior notification of, and a
reasonable amount of information about, large transactions was made available to the

Purchase Short-Term Access to HeinOnline

Prices starting as low as $29.95

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)

We also offer annual subscriptions to universities, colleges, law firms, organizations, and other institutions. To request a quote please visit http://home.heinonline.org/subscriptions/request-a-quote/

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please view http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/CSV.csv?index=journals&collection=journals