About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 111 (2007)
Outing Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Confidential Employment Discrimination Settlements

handle is hein.journals/waslee64 and id is 119 raw text is: Outing Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Confidential Employment Discrimination Settlements Minna J. Kotkin* Abstract Recent empirical studies on outcomes in employment discrimination litigation all reach the same conclusion: Plaintifs have little chance of success. But these studies rely on summary judgment decisions and trial verdicts, gleaned from reported opinions, electronic docket entries, and data collected by the Administrative Office of the Courts, and they acknowledge that this is just the tip of the iceberg. Until now, settlement outcomes, which account for 70% of case resolutions, have been rendered invisible because of confidential settlement agreements. Along with the vanishing trial syndrome, secret settlements have created an information vacuum, skewing the public policy discourse about employment discrimination litigation and leaving the judiciary, litigants, and attorneys without benchmarks by which to negotiate resolutions. This Article reports on an anonymously coded dataset of 1,170 cases settled by federal magistrate judges in Chicago over a six-year period ending in 2005, and provides the first detailed analysis of settlement outcomes. These data reveals that employment discrimination claimants, who account for over 40% of the dataset, obtain a mean recovery of $54,651. Among the factors analyzed as they relate to settlement amount are: type of discrimination, type of adverse employment action, stage of litigation, and amount of lost wages. * Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. This Article could not have been written without the cooperation and support of Hon. Morton Denlow, Presiding Magistrate Judge, Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, who spearheaded the effort to create the Chicago settlement database and made it available to me, and Jennifer Shack, Director of Research at the Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, who developed and maintains the database. Rebecca Widom, Director of Research, Urban Justice Center, provided invaluable statistical analysis and assistance. I presented this Article at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies at the University of Texas Law School, and thank Linda Krieger for her comments and participants for their feedback. Thanks also to my research assistants, Cheryl Baxter and Jennifer Williams, Brooklyn Law School, Class of 2007. I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Brooklyn Law School Summer Research Stipend Program.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most