About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

26 Queen's L.J. 101 (2000-2001)
Same-Sex Sexual Harassment in Employment

handle is hein.journals/queen26 and id is 111 raw text is: Same-Sex Sexual Harassment in Employment Janine Benedet* The author examines how courts and tribunals have dealt with the issue of same-sex sexual harassment. By exploring both Canadian and American jurisprudence, she identifies the two principal conceptual models that have been used by courts and tribunals in defining and identifying same-sex sexual harassment: the differential treatment model and the sexual content model. She eventually rejects both in favour of a model based on substantive equality. The differential treatment model looks for harassment that would not have occurred but for the complainant's sex. While this is helpful in working environments that have employees of both sexes, it is not helpful in addressing sexual harassment in single-sex working environments or where complainants are of both sexes. Conversely, the sexual content model looks to whether the conduct creates a sexually charged atmosphere, for example through jokes and other sexual comments. The author argues that this approach is also insufficient in single-sex workplaces or where the sexual content is not explicitly discriminatory. The author instead opts for an approach based on substantive equality. Such an approach, rather than looking at the nature of the harassment or at the sex of the complainants, focuses on the effects of the alleged harassment. By taking into account the social context of the harassment, the substantive equality approach effectively eliminates the problems with the other two models and addresses the discriminatory nature of all sexual harassment. Introduction I. Canadian Decisions on Same-Sex Sexual Harassment II. United States Decisions - Limits of the Differential Treatment Approach III. United States Decisions - Limits of the Sexual Content Approach IV. Specific Statutory Definitions V. Sexual Orientation Harassment *Assistant Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, Ontario. I am grateful for the research assistance of Tyler Powell and Andrea Unikowsky. An earlier version of this paper also benefited from research by Lara Edwards and Wendy Atkinson of Heenan Blaikie, Toronto. J. Benedet 101

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most