About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

19 Jurimetrics J. 1 (1978-1979)
Eyewitness Testimony: The Dangers of Guessing

handle is hein.journals/juraba19 and id is 23 raw text is: £ ARICE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY: THE DANGERS OF GUESSING Reid Hastie,* Robert Landsmant and Elizabeth F. Loftus ABSTRACT In Experiment 1, college students watched a series of slides depicting a street crime. Some of the subjects were then asked a series of questions and they were urged to guess at the answers if they were uncertain. Relative to control subjects, those who guessed were more likely to commit false alarm errors on a final test given later on. Experiment 2 showed that the confidence level of a person who guesses about a detail can rise over time rather than decline. It is argued that guessing can cause a change in a person's memorial representation-guesses can fill in a vague and schematic representation making it more vivid. These results have implications for the conduct of police and courtroom interrogation procedures. Psychologists have addressed the problem of evaluating the validity of eyewitness testimony since the earliest days of experimental research on human memory. Generally, researchers have concluded that eyewitness reports provide a delicate, unreliable route to historical truth. Numerous sources of error and failure have been revealed by research mimicking the conditions obtained in natural eyewitness situations.' The conditions under which the eyewitness is interrogated provide one of the major sources of threats to testimony validity. These condi- tions are under the control of legal and police authorities. A far from rare practice involves, in essence, asking a witness who is not quite *This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation to Reid Hastie and in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Mental Health to Elizabeth Loftus. Please address all correspondence to E. Loftus, Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195. tHarvard University. *University of Washington. 'Woocher, F. Did your eyes deceive you? Expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification, 29 STAN. L. REv. 1977, 969-1030. FALL 1978

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most